<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: B2B Email Marketers: New Opt-Out Regulations Effective July 7, 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteusb2b.com/b2b-marketing-blog/index.php/new-can-spam-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteusb2b.com/b2b-marketing-blog/index.php/new-can-spam-regulations/</link>
	<description>Strategies, Insights &#38; Perspectives on Business-to-Business Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:31:25 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Marn</title>
		<link>http://www.proteusb2b.com/b2b-marketing-blog/index.php/new-can-spam-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Marn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.francis-marketing.com/b2b-marketing-blog/?p=100#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Good clarification, Galen. 
This is a perfect opportunity to preserve the trust of your online audience. Marketers who see this &quot;separation&quot; as simply an opportunity to, in effect, continue bombardment under a different name will pay the ultimate price in credibility. Those who manage it well, as you suggest--ie, make the situation very clear on the &quot;you are unsubscribed&quot; note (perhaps even asking the recipient&#039;s desire given the situation)--will fare the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good clarification, Galen.<br />
This is a perfect opportunity to preserve the trust of your online audience. Marketers who see this &#8220;separation&#8221; as simply an opportunity to, in effect, continue bombardment under a different name will pay the ultimate price in credibility. Those who manage it well, as you suggest&#8211;ie, make the situation very clear on the &#8220;you are unsubscribed&#8221; note (perhaps even asking the recipient&#8217;s desire given the situation)&#8211;will fare the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
